[vox] Rumor has it SACLUG is dead.

[Brian E. Lavender]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 05:53:50PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Brian E. Lavender (brian at brie.com):
> 
> > SacLUG is still alive, but since I now teach adjunct, I am finding
> > a harder time having meetings. Maybe we should just start a club at
> > American River College? That's where I teach adjunct. I teach them all
> > Windoze. :) Actually, I teach intro programming class and structured
> > programming in C/C++.
> 
> I was _pretty_ sure you noticed the 1999 time-stamp on the referenced
> page (in the URL among other places).  But I just wanted to make sure.
> 
> I figured you _probably_ were just making a joke, pretending to not
> notice you were referring to a 17-year-old meeting bulletin.

Yes, that was me trying to be funny! When we started SacLUG, uh, 17 years 
ago, the "wasn't there another SacLUG" haunted us for years. I am not
sure of the original founder. He probably came to the meeting and
introduced himself and I probably didn't pay attention.

-- 
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/

"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."

Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture