[vox-tech] Re: What anti-spam techniques do you use?

Henry House vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:15:25 -0800


--C94crkcyjafcjHxo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 01:51:48AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> there's not much you can do once the mail is delivered to your mailbox.

I disagree.

[...]
> begin John C. Alden <jcalden@dcn.davis.ca.us>=20
> >=20
> > My DCN address is getting pummeled more & more with spam. Now it's
> > about 75% of all the mail I receive. Don't know where they're getting
> > it, but I'm getting TIRED of it, (those steenkin' bastards).
> >=20
> > What techniques and/or tools do you use for spammers not using a major
> > service (aohell, earthlink, msn) that has an abuse@ address?

John: I have been extremely happy with spamassassin (http://spamassassin.or=
g/),
which is a perl script that uses several heuristics to identify spam. It has
been about 99% acurate for me without any tuning! I invoke spamassassin via
procmail, using the following recipe:

	# Run incoming messages through SpamAssassin
	:0fw
	| spamassassin -P

	:0e
	{
		EXITCODE=3D$?
	}

	:0: =20
	* ^Subject:.*\*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*\*
	Junk/SPAMASSASSIN/

I will post my full .procmailrc upon request.

--=20
Henry House
The attached file is a digital signature. See <http://romana.hajhouse.org/p=
gp>
for information.  My OpenPGP key: <http://romana.hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc>.

--C94crkcyjafcjHxo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8Yar9KK1cAVjXujwRAmZoAJ45GwW//WntbvWuxAOziT4EF6l3kwCfb/EZ
/KGBAzE/LHdgySzlJZXXwgQ=
=MZf+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--C94crkcyjafcjHxo--