[vox] Best Linux PDF Editor

[Jeff Newmiller]

That was remarkably obtuse, Darth. Rick is taking the high road,  but you might learn something if you actually read before replying. Commercial does not mean what you seem convinced it means. 

And no, cross-posting has always been bad netiquette, so it appears you have been misled somewhere along the line. 
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

On May 5, 2017 3:50:56 PM PDT, Darth Borehd <darth.borehd at gmail.com> wrote:
>I was told to always cross post.
>
>I mean commercial.  As in "you can't use it unless you pay money" kind.
>
>
>
>On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
>
>> [Snip cross-post, as cross-posting across LUG mailing lists, in my
>> experience, causes problems for the listadmins]
>>
>> Quoting Darth Borehd (darth.borehd at gmail.com):
>>
>> > I have seen Foxit, Master PDF, and PDF Studio are commercial
>packages
>> that
>> > work on Linux.  Should I get one?  Is there a free option
>somewhere?
>>
>> I can provide a comprehensive list of PDF editing codebases (and
>various
>> people's notes about them) for you to explore:
>>
>> "PDF Editors" on http://linuxmafia.com/kb/Apps/
>>
>> (Deciding what's 'best' is entirely up to you.)
>>
>>
>> P.S.:  I believe you meant proprietary, when you said 'commercial':
>> The latter term means 'characterised by commerce', which is true of
>open
>> source programs as well as proprietary ones, but your meaning is
>'under
>> restrictive licensing', not 'I can pay money to get a copy'.  E.g.,
>FSF
>> has for decades offered for sale suites of GNU software, which means
>> that is commercial by definition.
>> _______________________________________________
>> vox mailing list
>> vox at lists.lugod.org
>> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox
>>