[vox-tech] X-No-Archive Inheritance?

[Ryan Castellucci]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 17 October 2003 02:45 pm, Jonathan Stickel wrote:
> I hesitate to post my 2-cents due to ignorance, but here goes:
>
> It seems to me that the point of choosing not to archive a message (wit=
h
> X-No-Archive) is because the message is not worth archiving for some
> reason (e.g. one-liner, too silly, etc.).
>
> Anyone thinking that they can protect personal information by not
> archiving a message should think again.  Any message sent to a vox list
> is sent to over 100 different person's mailboxes who can do with it wha=
t
> they will...

My concern is that someone could post a question that deals with somethin=
g=20
illegal (DMCA violations). Archiving this would be bad.

- --=20
PGP/GPG Fingerprint: 3B30 C6BE B1C6 9526 7A90  34E7 11DF 44F3 7217 7BC7
On pgp.mit.edu, import with `gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 72177=
BC7`
Also available at http://www.cal.net/~ryan/ryan_at_mother_dot_com.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQE/kKjPEd9E83IXe8cRArK8AJYu4odaf/bz6Q6RSNwBUe7QfV5aAJ4544O9
gic55H4p0l0GfhPDgJ8qkg=3D=3D
=3D9Pu6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----