[vox-tech] fonts and web pages
Peter Jay Salzman
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 10:15:23 -0700
i'm picking on garamond, but the questions apply to all fonts...
according to opera, i have 3 garamond families:
garamond [Monotype]
garamond [Freefont]
garamond [Xft]
according to gimp, i have 2 garamond families:
garamond [freefont] -> only provides an italic font
garamond [monotype] -> very large family.
i'm curious:
1. why 3 families in opera and 2 in gimp? i doubt xft is an opera
supplied font.
2. tex has MANY "type 1" garamond fonts. X supports "type 1" fonts.
why can't a browser use tex's "type 1" garamond fonts?
3. i've determined that opera typesets:
<FONT face="garamond">hello world</FONT>
with garamond [Xft]. in fact, from a font dialog box, it looks like
[Xft] is an anti-aliased (or perhaps an emboldened) version of
[freefont].
can i use <FONT> to instruct a browser to use Monotype's Garamond
instead of Freetype's? something along the lines of:
<FONT face="garamond" foundry="monotype">hello world</FONT>
<FONT face="garamond" foundry="freetype">hello world</FONT>
<FONT face="garamond" foundry="xft">hello world</FONT>
i'm asking because:
a. i'd like to compare fonts for myself (curiosity).
b. freefont's garamond stinks. you'd think that garamond is an
italic font since italic is the only family within freefont's
garamond. but garamond is NOT an italic only font...
pete
--
GPG Instructions: http://www.dirac.org/linux/gpg
GPG Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D