[vox-tech] Re: What anti-spam techniques do you use?

[Henry House]

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:32:29PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> begin Henry House <hajhouse@houseag.com>=20
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 01:51:48AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > there's not much you can do once the mail is delivered to your mailbo=
x.
> >=20
> > I disagree.
>=20
> i will repeat myself.
> =20
> once an email gets delivered to your mailbox, henry, you are relegated to:
>=20
> 1. passive methods like filtering
> 2. retroactive methods like spamcop or richochet
>=20
> my entire email (which i gather you didn't read, otherwise you wouldn't
> have taken it out of context so poorly) was based on the premise that we
> would like proactive methods.  meaning, not even giving the spammer the
> opportunity to connect with your smtp server in the first place.  i
> thought i made this very clear in my email.

Guilty as charged :-(. Sorry for misinterpreting your words.

--=20
Henry House
The attached file is a digital signature. See <http://romana.hajhouse.org/p=
gp>
for information.  My OpenPGP key: <http://romana.hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc>.

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8YcKvKK1cAVjXujwRArg5AKCAe2kYlCMhSo2oRBVtAV7GQfEn6QCgsuFZ
oV6DSLyIDnUn7hq4m9WL0Ok=
=BV2n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--K8nIJk4ghYZn606h--