[vox-tech] Re: junkbuster. whoa. i'm a convert.

[Peter Jay Salzman]

i'm trying to decide whether i want junkbuster to manage cookies.  the
mechanism is by far more configurable than anything i've ever seen.  i like
the idea of feeding cookies that say "leave me the PHRACK alone" back to the
servers that send cookies.

it would be a bit more convenient to do it with opera, however.  opera has a
pretty advanced cookie system right now with all the features you'd expect
like blocking/allowing cookies on a per-site basis.  and lots more.

i'm trying to decide.  does anyone have any wisdom that points to either
direction?   opera managed cookies or junkbuster managed cookies?


i'm curious though -- i took a quick look at the faq and didn't immediately
see how to disable cookie cutting.   how do you do it?

pete


begin Ryan <ryan@mother.com> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> You know how to tell it not to block cookies? I prefer to let konqueror take 
> care of that.
> 
> On Friday, December 14 2001 01:12 pm, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > begin p <p>
> >
> > > i just installed junkbuster for the first time.  all i can say is...
> > > whoa.
> > >
> > > my only complaint is that browsing seem to be perceptively slower.  not
> > > enough to stop using junkbuster, but it's a bit noticeable.  it's nice
> > > that junkbuster seems to read the blockfile dynamically, but i wonder if
> > > reading and parsing the file contributes to the lag.  this probably is a
> > > queue to look into the squid cacher.
> >
> > i take it back.  junkbuster doesn't read the blockfile on the fly.  my bad.
> >
> > pete

-- 
               ** Please don't send me html email **
PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E  70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D
PGP Public Key:  finger p@dirac.org