[vox] Dependencies

[Brian Lavender]

Or, perhaps it is time to bring out the dining philosophers!

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 06:30:22PM -0700, Brian Lavender wrote:
> Good reason for a Petri Net! ;-)
> 
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:59:16AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> > 
> > Good xkcd on dependencies (remember to hover for the alt text joke):
> > 
> >   http://xkcd.com/754/
> > 
> > -- 
> > -bill!
> > Sent from my computer
> > _______________________________________________
> > vox mailing list
> > vox at lists.lugod.org
> > http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox
> 
> -- 
> Brian Lavender
> http://www.brie.com/brian/
> 
> "There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
> make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
> way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
> 
> Professor C. A. R. Hoare
> The 1980 Turing award lecture
> _______________________________________________
> vox mailing list
> vox at lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox

-- 
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/

"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."

Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture