[vox] [fwd] adverse trial court ruling against SCO

[Brian Lavender]

So is SCO finally dead? 

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 04:15:10PM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote:
> 
> I admit I haven't looked at the links yet, but I trust Christian knows
> what he's talking about ;)  Seen on SF-LUG's list:
> 
> -bill!
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Christian Einfeldt -----
> 
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:53:58 -0700
> From: Christian Einfeldt
> Subject: [sf-lug] adverse trial court ruling against SCO
> 
>    Microsoft's proxy in its battle against Linux, SCO, receives an adverse
>    ruling in the federal trial court:
>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/11/sco_novell/
>    For a quick and dirty summary of the end phase of the case, go to SCO's
>    wikipedia page:
>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_Group#2010
>    Microsoft and the Linux community have no common ground.  To the extent
>    that Microsoft wins, we lose.  To the extent that we win, Microsoft loses.
>     That axiom might not always be true into the future, but it is true
>    today.  Today, Microsoft lost.  Today, we won a small battle. 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> -- 
> -bill!
> Sent from my computer
> _______________________________________________
> vox mailing list
> vox at lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox

-- 
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/

"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."

Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture