[vox] Streaming flash videos yourself (no YouTube or Google Video
needed)
Dave Margolis
dave at silogram.net
Tue Feb 13 13:01:58 PST 2007
On Feb 12, 2007, at 3:22 PM, jim stockford wrote:
>> After two short Google searches, I found this article:
>> "Video and Audio Streaming with Flash and Open Source Tools"
>> http://klaus.geekserver.net/flash/streaming.html
>> Sounds perfect! Hopefully I'll have some time to look into it and
>> get it
>> going on my baby photos/video pages. :)
> I wish i understood why it's worth the trouble--how come
> putting videos up on a web page isn't good enough?
> (serious question--why bother with flash?)
>
>> -bill!
> jim
For any given type of video, a user needs a new player (or at least a
new library of codecs). Flash video plays in the Flash player -
which almost everybody has or can easily get. The Flash player is
also a self-healing plugin. This means if you have the Flash 4
player installed on your system and you encounter a site that needs
Flash 9 (for example), the player will almost always do the right
thing - easy install, no browser restart, users can install the flash
player locally (one doesn't need to be root), etc.
Also, the FLV format (available since Flash 7) self-streams very
economically over HTTP. This means you can get similar performance
from a regular FLV file on a regular web server to what you can get
with Real or QuickTime on their respective expensive and proprietary
media servers.
The reason why YouTube works as well as it does has mostly to do with
their clever leveraging of this technology - dekstop video (in almost
any format) to web video in a few easy clicks. The slick tagging
system as well as the "here is the code you need to embed this in
your blog" are also incredible features.
Bill, this couldn't have come at a better time - I am currently
researching how to do a local YouTube-ish Flash-based-video system.
Thanks for sending and keep us posted on your progress!
Dave
More information about the vox
mailing list