[vox] Outlaws redux

[Richard Burkhart]

> -----Original Message-----
> Admittedly, I'm reading a heluvalot between the lines, but to me it
> seems to be the most /likely/ intent. Their wording is *very*
> ambiguous. I'd be tempted to draw conclusions on the competency of the
> author for a legal occupation based on that, but I'd hate for them to
> come across that in the archives ;-)
>
> Anyway, I know that the real reason for the poor wording/writing is
> most likely that they spent a total of ~2.8 seconds in reading,
> contemplating, and responding to the request... :-/

Or it's DELIBERATELY ambiguous and vague, so that:
  - We'd have to come BACK to clarify, wasting our time (and if it's enough
of a waste of time, we'll (alla us commie linux geeks) go away and play
tuxracer instead).
  - When this is brought into court, it's easy to say "No, we didn't mean
THAT ... we meant THIS."