From bill at broadley.org  Fri Mar 10 19:40:00 2017
From: bill at broadley.org (Bill Broadley)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:40:00 -0800
Subject: [vox-tech] Signed email and mailing lists.
In-Reply-To: <CAA-5o3hAzUVOTKtGZk43C8OHzkpCJTt3n-EmdC9c_3TvX4KB+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA-5o3gOkwj4i_601vbaW43TqVv1D_44vxrJ7G0oKT=jhJBA5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO=Cg3fLRk4+wXEtBnct5Jjg+yfnKHoTSEVc2ZP8Tg3-yXiPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA-5o3hAzUVOTKtGZk43C8OHzkpCJTt3n-EmdC9c_3TvX4KB+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fe3cf653-c161-a956-2b7a-ac80c376d5f0@broadley.org>


Does it bother anyone else the signed email goes to Lugod's mail server, gets
modified, and then is sent to all the subscribers with a broken signature?

I can think of some choices:

1) have lugod's mail server strip the users DKIM signature.

2) have lugod's mail server resign it with a lugod.org signature.

3) Have the Lugod server forward mail without adding a signature.

4) do nothing.

Thoughts?