[vox-tech] Rescuing NTFS partition

Darth Borehd darth.borehd at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 20:44:03 PDT 2012


I've rescued data off NTFS disks before with the "scrounge" program.

On 19 March 2012 19:35, Peter Salzman <p at dirac.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> A 2GB Hitachi drive holding one NTFS partition got hosed.   The drive
> is literally one year old, and my belief is that this is a hardware
> failure, not a filesystem hosing.
>
> I see the drive in BIOS, so perhaps not all is lost.  Windows fails to
> even acknowledge the drive's existence, so I'm trying to rescue it on
> Linux.  I've never rescued an NTFS partition before.
>
> Doing some reading I found ntfsclone, so I figured the best thing to
> do would be to make a copy of the drive.   I used:
>
> ntfsclone --force --rescue -o /ftp/storage.img /dev/sdc1
>
> but it's basically stuck at 57.71%:
>
> ntfsclone v2011.4.12AR.4 (libntfs-3g)
> NTFS volume version: 3.1
> Cluster size       : 4096 bytes
> Current volume size: 2000396288000 bytes (2000397 MB)
> Current device size: 2000396289024 bytes (2000397 MB)
> Scanning volume ...
> 56.71 percent completed
>
> which generates entries in /var/log/messages along the lines of:
>
>
> Mar 19 21:49:17 satan kernel: [3492239.910141] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc]
> Sense Key : Hardware Error [current]
> Mar 19 21:49:17 satan kernel: [3492239.910146] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc]
> Add. Sense: No additional sense information
> Mar 19 21:49:17 satan kernel: [3492239.910151] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] CDB:
> Read(10): 28 00 00 62 57 a7 00 00 08 00
> Mar 19 21:50:39 satan kernel: [3492321.522843] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc]
> Unhandled sense code
>
> It's not even clear whether ntfsclone is actually *reading* the drive.
>  Scanning could just be checking FS integrity.  Anyhow, I was curious
> about something.
>
> What exactly is the difference between dd (or ddrescue) which is how I
> normally rescued partitions in the past and ntfsclone?   Which tool
> would be more appropriate for rescuing as many files as possible?
>
> Any words of wisdom from people who been here / done this?
>
> Thanks!
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> vox-tech mailing list
> vox-tech at lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.lugod.org/pipermail/vox-tech/attachments/20120319/e8f5398b/attachment.htm 


More information about the vox-tech mailing list