[vox-tech] postgrey is dangerous?

[Brian Lavender]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:03:31AM -0700, Larry Ozeran wrote:
> On 6/29/2008 at 4:17 PM Tony Cratz sent:
> 
> >Larry Ozeran wrote:
> [snip]
> >> After going around with them twice, I don't have what I feel is an
> >adequate answer. Any thoughts on why someone might think that postgrey is
> >"unsafe"? Better yet, any strategies for countering this thinking?
> [snip]
> >	So the bottom line is, using Postgrey now is just a waste of
> >	computer resources and time. As fir it currently being a
> >	security issue, I can't find anything to suggest this is
> >	still true. But your ISP may be using it as an excuse to
> >	not waste their time setting it up, or they may not be using
> >	Postfix (which is required for Postgrey). They could be using
> >	Sendmail, Qmail or Exim.
> 
> Thanks for getting me up to speed.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >	I hope this gives you some more info.
> >							Tony
> 
> It did. I'll go a different direction with my web hosts. Thanks again.

I use sa-exim. Here is Marc Merlin's page on it. 
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html

-- 
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/