[vox-tech] Three Install Questions
Peter Jay Salzman
p at dirac.org
Mon Feb 21 11:36:39 PST 2005
On Mon 21 Feb 05, 11:14 AM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> said:
> Quoting Peter Jay Salzman (p at dirac.org):
>
> > 1. Having multiple swaps per disk is of almost no benefit at all.
>
> So, a client of mine builds Linux servers, and provides a custom RHEL
> 3.0 build image for one particular customer that buys a lot of 4 GB RAM
> dual Opteron systems with dual 73GB SCSI drives. Customer management,
> for reasons that passeth understanding, insisted they wanted 32GB of
> swap space on each node,
Jumping Jehosephat!!!
> and moreover wanted all of it in a single partition on the boot drive.
core dumped.
> nSuch systems were duly delivered, but
> customer soon reported that the systems were hanging hard while in
> production use.
>
> Extensive tests followed using the Cerberus Test Control Suite (CTCS),
> which stress-tests Linux boxes using a number of simultaneous software
> processes including iterative kernel compiles. With a single 32GB swap
> partition, CTCS induced a system hang in 1 day. With a pair of 16GB
> swap partitions, CTCS hung the box in 2 days. With four 8 GB swap
> partitions, five days. And thus up to the ideal configuration, using as
> many 2 GB swap partitions as the limits on SCSI device numbers
> permitted, in which, as far as we could tell, CTCS ran forever. The
> customer's load image was duly modified, and the cause has been
> presumptively attributed to hitting a bug in the RHEL 3.0 kernel's VM code.
>
> (Yes, there was indeed no rational reason why customer needed to deploy
> all that swap in the first place. But that's not the point I was
> making.)
But does anyone even KNOW what caused the hang? Maybe it was the fact that
fdisk was run on Wednesday without the hardware clock reading 3:30 while
Mars and Jupiter were in alignment. That's the thing with bugs -- you
really don't know anything unless you study the bug.
Other than a story of a poorly understood case where multiple swaps per disk
seemed to surpress the expression of a VM bug, can you describe what benefit
multiple swaps per disk give?
Maybe someone, somewhere can tell a story where multiple swaps per disk
crashed a system due to a filesystem bug. ;)
Pete
--
Save Star Trek Enterprise from extinction: http://www.saveenterprise.com
GPG Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D
More information about the vox-tech
mailing list