[vox-tech] a firefox question
Ken Bloom
kabloom at ucdavis.edu
Wed Feb 9 16:45:52 PST 2005
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:36:57 -0800
"Karsten M. Self" <kmself at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> on Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:07:55AM -0800, Jonathan Stickel
> (jjstickel at sbcglobal.net) wrote:
> > Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > >On Thu 03 Feb 05, 12:10 PM, Matt Roper <matt at mattrope.com> said:
> > >
> > >>On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:01:50AM -0800, Jonathan Stickel wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>These have been some interesting discussions about FireFox. One
> > >thing >>Pete originally complained about that hasn't been
> > >discussed is the >>opening of new windows when you would rather
> > >they would go to another >>tab. This often frustrates me as well.
> > > From what I can tell, this
> > >>>occurs when some java happy web designer wraps a link with
> > >javascript to >>open a new window. Left-clicking on these links
> > >opens the content in a >>new window, as expected. Middle-clicking
> > >on the link opens a blank tab >>with the javascript in the
> > >location bar. Since java code is not a valid >>location, nothing
> > >opens. I hope this gets fixed in future versions. >
> > >>I believe the Tab-Mix plugin
> > >>(http://hemiolapei.free.fr/divers/tabmix/tabmix.html.en) will
> > >solve this >problem. It also adds several other useful options for
> > >configuring tab >behavior.
> > >
> > >
> > >On my system, this extension noticeably slows down FF! But on the
> > >page for tab-mix, there's a reference to another extension called
> > >"single window" which looks like it does what I want:
> > >
> > >http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=290
> > >
> > >Pete
> > >
> >
> > I ended up using "Tabbrowser Preferences"
> > http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/more-info/tabprefs
> > Actually, it was the first I tried, and I am happy with it so far.
>
> Note that there are *THREE* separate tab extensions for Firefox. I'm
> with comments by Peter (?): tabbed browsing is sufficiently deep and
> coupled to the interface that it should be integrated, not bolted on.
>
> The choices:
>
> - Tabbrowser Extension (TBE)
> - Tabbrowser Preferences (TBP).
> - Tab Mix. (tabmix)
>
> TBE is, by its own author's admission, unmaintainable spaghetti, and
> by Firefox developers' reports, prone to rendering FFX highly
> unstable.
This is what I'm using. Haven't had any problems with it.
> On
> the pro side, TBE has the broadest feature set, and while many of
> these are questionable, those who are used to the well-thought-out
> design of, say, Galeon 1.2.x, can find a configuration which comes
> very close.
>
> TBP is less featureful but far more stable. It lacks a number of
> preferences I'd like to see. It's downright boneheaded in some of the
> things it doesn't allow.
>
> tabmix is supposed to be more stable, though I'm not sure of the
> featureset. It's mentioned on the TBE homepage as a preferred
> alternative.
>
>
> Peace.
>
> --
> Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com>
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
> What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
> I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only
> sentient race in the sector and they're made out of meat.
> - Terry Bison, Meat Beings
>
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://ns1.livepenguin.com/pipermail/vox-tech/attachments/20050209/df75da7f/attachment.bin
More information about the vox-tech
mailing list