[vox-tech] Self-replacing license [was Urgent news: Linux may be relicensed]

Micah Cowan micah at cowan.name
Mon Apr 4 10:59:48 PDT 2005


Rick Moen wrote:

>>It's their interpretation of a specific sentence in 17 USC 201 that I
>>find extremely questionable.
> 
> My point was that it _is_ the way copyright law is applied, as a result
> of a couple of hundred years of caselaw.  Now, I'm sorry if that differs
> from what a lot of programmers assumed to be the case, but it's
> nonetheless true.

Can you cite specific examples? That's kind of what I was complaining 
that she didn't do. It seems very strongly to go against what the actual 
text of the law says.

-Micah


More information about the vox-tech mailing list