[vox-tech] Self-replacing license [was Urgent news: Linux may
be relicensed]
Micah Cowan
micah at cowan.name
Mon Apr 4 10:59:48 PDT 2005
Rick Moen wrote:
>>It's their interpretation of a specific sentence in 17 USC 201 that I
>>find extremely questionable.
>
> My point was that it _is_ the way copyright law is applied, as a result
> of a couple of hundred years of caselaw. Now, I'm sorry if that differs
> from what a lot of programmers assumed to be the case, but it's
> nonetheless true.
Can you cite specific examples? That's kind of what I was complaining
that she didn't do. It seems very strongly to go against what the actual
text of the law says.
-Micah
More information about the vox-tech
mailing list