[vox-tech] screen question
Ken Bloom
kabloom at ucdavis.edu
Mon Nov 1 09:07:21 PST 2004
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:53:30 -0500
p at dirac.org (Peter Jay Salzman) wrote:
> Thanks Mike. I did try the remote detach (-d). It *said* that the
> session was forcibly detached, but a subsequent "screen -ls" showed
> the session as still being attached.
>
> Here's an example:
>
>
> # Try to reattach
> #
> born$ screen -r
> There is a screen on:
> 25783.pts-2.born (Attached)
> There is no screen to be resumed.
>
> # OK, try to detach. Looks like it worked.
> #
> born$ screen -d
> [25783.pts-2.born detached.]
>
> # Apparently, it didn't!
> #
> born$ screen -ls
> There is a screen on:
> 25783.pts-2.born (Attached)
> 1 Socket in /home/psalzman/.screen.
>
> # Confirmed. It didn't detach.
> #
> born$ screen -r
> There is a screen on:
> 25783.pts-2.born (Attached)
> There is no screen to be resumed.
> born$
>
>
> It looks like "screen -R" looks for a screen to be resumed, doesn't
> find one, so it starts a new screen session.
>
> Looks like I can name the session to be remotely detached/reattached,
> but that doesn't work either:
>
>
> born$ screen -d 25783.pts-2.born
> [25783.pts-2.born detached.]
>
> born$ screen -r 25783.pts-2.born
> There is a screen on:
> 25783.pts-2.born (Attached)
> There is no screen to be resumed matching 25783.pts-2.born.
>
I was able to reproduce this problem in with screen in CSIF.
screen-3.9.15-10 (that's the same version you've got)
See if you can work around the problem by using
$ screen -d -R
(both parameters at the same time)
it worked for me.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://ns1.livepenguin.com/pipermail/vox-tech/attachments/20041101/87212a24/attachment.bin
More information about the vox-tech
mailing list