[vox-tech] DIMM speed question

[vox-tech@lists.lugod.org]

i'm glad this was mentioned because i was planning on installing the
DIMMs backwards.  thankfully i read this in time, and know better now...

;)

pete



On Tue 28 Oct 03, 10:31 AM, Richard Burkhart <richard@khanfusion.net> said:
> Last time I heard 128 pins = 128 pins.
> 
> But 128 pins, rotated 180 degrees so that the notch-key is in the wrong
> place, and then forced in with 'Armstrong Torque(tm)' is contra-indicated in
> the motherboard user manual.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> 
> > On Tue 28 Oct 03,  8:57 AM, Michael J Wenk <wenk@praxis.homedns.org> said:
> > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:48:29AM -0800, Rod Roark wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 28 October 2003 07:37 am, p@dirac.org wrote:
> > > > > can you use faster DIMMs, say 2100PC, on a machine rated
> > for slower DIMMs?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, as far as I know.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Id be careful of voltage requirements.  Also, I know this goes without
> > > saying, but I will say this anyways, do not force a DIMM into a socket.
> > > if the grooves don't match, then it won't work.
> >
> > huh?   isn't 128 pins equal to 128 pins?
> >
> > pete
> >
> >
> > --
> > GPG Instructions: http://www.dirac.org/linux/gpg
> > GPG Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D
> > _______________________________________________
> > vox-tech mailing list
> > vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
> > http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vox-tech mailing list
> vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech

-- 
GPG Instructions: http://www.dirac.org/linux/gpg
GPG Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D