[vox-tech] Question about listing loaded modules by process...

[ME]

> On Thursday 13 June 2002 08:08 am, ME wrote:
> > In cases where there is possibility of a root via a rootkit and an LKM
> [snip]
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Shawn P. Neugebauer wrote:
> and LKM == Linux Kernel module?

That works for us ... or Loadable Kernel Module (wider) to include any
*NIX OS that may allow loading modules in much the same way.

Sorry. Too many TLA (Three Letter Acronyms)

:-)

-ME

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/CM$/IT$/LS$/S/O$ !d--(++) !s !a+++(-----) C++$(++++) U++++$(+$) P+$>+++ 
L+++$(++) E W+++$(+) N+ o K w+$>++>+++ O-@ M+$ V-$>- !PS !PE Y+ !PGP
t@-(++) 5+@ X@ R- tv- b++ DI+++ D+ G--@ e+>++>++++ h(++)>+ r*>? z?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
decode: http://www.ebb.org/ungeek/ about: http://www.geekcode.com/geek.html